Author Archives: /gst

You are a hostage. Don’t despair.

It’s not your fault. It’s not your fault. It’s not your fault. It’s not your fault.

Glenn here, husband of Barb. I’m channeling Robin Williams from the movie “Good Will Hunting”, because you need to know about something going on in the world of audiology and hearing aids. There are audiologists and dispensers alike who are plotting ways to take you hostage. But it’s not your fault that you don’t know. Apparently, this tactic is supposed to remain a State Secret.

What follows are excerpts from a discussion I am having right now with an audiologist in Portugal. Fortunately, his english is better than my portuguese. Much better. On a discussion board for hearing professionals I mentioned how I thought some audiologists in the US were abdicating their ethics in effort to make sales, which spurred this question from Joao:

Joao Ferrao

“… And please (I hope not pushing you to far) can you explain what do you mean with: “pursuing the path of taking patients      prisoner using methods designed to lock-in patients”? Thanks ;)

P.S.- Portuguese market is very different than yours. Here audiology is a newborn activity (15 years). So it’s very important for me  sharing and getting new knowledges.”

Here’s where you come in. Imagine you are Joao. Imagine you are listening to Barb, not me. I’m sure Barb would explain the situation better:

“Joao, about prisoners and lock-in. In the US there are groups of dispensers banding together to form loose “private networks”. Like a franchise, but not really. A description clear as mud and equally, as accurate. My audiologist wife Barb is a member of a form of one, but there are many – and many versions. It’s important to note that not all networks engage in the tactics below. As a matter of fact, most don’t (and for sake of clarity, the group Barb is a member of doesn’t take hostages). 

Back to the very important task of locking up prisoners, oops, patients:
A representative of a private network approaches a manufacturer. We want to feature your hearing aids. We will sell only your brand, but with the following conditions:
A. We don’t want to use your name “y”. We want to call it “x” instead.
B. Nobody else can use the name “x”. Only us.
C. We want you to change the name as seen on your fitting software to program your hearing aid “y” to display “x”, not “y”.
D. We want you to make it so only our network members can program the hearing aids named “x:” Nobody else. But we get to also program hearing aids “y” when they come through the door, too.

So beneath the outer shell, hearing aid “x” and its programming software is functionally identical to hearing aids the manufacturer sells to everybody as model “y” – except for hearing aids called “x” sold through the private network can only be programmed by network members.

In other words, a patient buys a hearing aid that people doing work in the industry knows is model “y”, but the patient isn’t informed that model “x” is actually model “y”, draped in a Hollywood-worthy costume. Patients are lead to believe they are getting an ultra-special model of hearing aid (from a major manufacturer!!!!, of course). They are not informed that if the name on the shell is removed, their hearing aid is actually model “y” that their friend down the street bought elsewhere. Patients are lead to believe their hearing aid “x” is more special than their friends hearing aid “y”, even though they are indeed identical in every manner except in costume and who can access the hearing aid to program it.

The manufacturer then continues to reinforce the ruse. A patient may be able to have their hearing aid programmed by a dispenser who is not a member of the private network (and maybe not, depending on whims and who farts), but the patient has to pay extra to get the hearing aid unlocked from the private network. So it costs the patient even more money to make hearing aid “y” into, well…. hearing aid “y”.

That, my Portuguese friend, is how you take patients prisoner.
Batteries, smoke, lies, and mirrors included.
Acts of Deception?
No charge.
Patients loss of freedom to choose?
Priceless. For the private network.
That’s what dispensers want to believe. I guess.
But I’m feeble minded. Can’t expect me to understand.
What’s REALLY going on. /gst

The problem I have with private label hearing aids is you are not being informed of restrictions you will later encounter. In essence, it’s like buying a new $32,000 Toyota Camry, then learning that you can only have your car serviced at five Toyota locations because your dealer swapped the Toyota-issued wheel covers for an aftermarket version.

How to protect yourself? Ask.

Before signing a purchase contract, ask your audiologist these questions:

  • Who manufacturers the hearing aid model being recommended? It should be a major name… Phonak, Starkey, Oticon, ReSound, Widex, Sonic Innovations or Siemens. If the audiologist answers with any other name, ask the question again. Press the issue. If you can’t get a clear answer of which major manufacturer makes the hearing aid, save yourself grief and choose another audiologist to work with.
  • Where can I get my hearing aids serviced? This part may be a bit tricky, because the answer can easily be misleading. What matters is whether you can take your hearing aids to any audiologist who dispenses [fill in brand name listed above], and it can be programmed without being charged a fee to “unlock” the hearing aid. Having flexibility is important if you move, travel, or simply wish to see another audiologist. I don’t care how many locations an audiologist cites as having access to because they are a member of a “special” group, none have locations everywhere and agreements to service hearing aids sold by “sister” clinics are notoriously unreliable. The closest group to having nationwide coverage is Costco (Kirkland-branded aids are locked) and Beltone (also locked). After that….. it’s spotty at best.
  • Ask your audiologist to show you the web page of the recommended hearing aid on the major manufacturers site (all start with the company name… phonak.com, starkey.com, oticon.com, etc.). If the audiologist doesn’t type in what you expect, you are probably being shown the private labeled version, not the official page created by the manufacturer for their product. A red flag if there ever was one. Nothing wrong with showing you both, though.
  • If you live in Southern Oregon (where Barb is located) call or email Barb with your questions. Yeah, this recommendation runs the danger of coming across as self serving but Barb and I are most concerned with you knowing what you are getting into before you buy. We know the brand names of quite a few hearing aids in the locked-in category and if we don’t, Barb or I will do the research for you gratis. Consider it a public service.
Remember as you go through the process, the goal you set for yourself – not to just hear, but to enjoy life.
Note: As you can surmise, I have no love of private-labeled hearing aids or for the process of locking you in as patient. I believe these developments are a disservice to you. However, I also believe you are smart enough to decide what is best for you as long as you know the benefits and pitfalls beforehand.
P.S. I posted this without Barb’s prior approval, and will probably get kicked in the you-know-what for doing it. Oh well, had that happen playing volleyball often enough so what Barb does shouldn’t be as bad. Anyway, I’ll get her to make additions and modifications as she sees fit. In the meantime (and the hereafter), have a ball.

Top-rated hearing tests you can do at home.

Hearing Test Shoot-Out

Choosing the best on-line hearing test was easier than expected. Most use some variation of the “If you hear the beep, raise your hand” style of test. Unfortunately, a tone test doesn’t perform well when done on the web. There are too many variables involved, so test results are rarely better than a wild guess. Even worse, regardless of results there will often be a plug for you to go see an audiologist. More than a bit cheesy!

I did, however, find a couple sites using what is called “speech-in-noise” testing. This type is better because it removes the worst variables that lead to questionable results. The fact that this method reasonably replicates real world situations that can make hearing difficulties apparent is, well, more than just icing on the cake.

How accurate are the recomended tests? If you follow the directions (not hard to do, mostly) and are honest with yourself (a biggie!) I would consider them to be pretty good. Just keep in mind your results will not indicate if one ear is worse than the other, but instead represents the sum of the hearing you have. Yes, I am aware that point makes me sound like I am a nit-picky audiologist. Humor me, it is an important point to consider.
So now that you know my hearing test biases, onward to the results….

Here’s an interesting tidbit. A few people called shortly after we posted this page and asked if headphones are necessary for these tests. The quick answer is no. It is better to use headphones if you have them, but a set of speakers hooked to your computer will work nearly as well. It is more important that you make sure “distractions” are minimized. Turn off TV’s or radios that you can hear. Wait until the heater or air conditioning has done its thing and is silent. Stuff noisy animals in the closet and tie the kids to a chimney on your neighbor’s house. Just kidding about the animals and kids. The point is, do these tests when the room you are in is really quiet.

Rated best: Hear-It.org

This site is run by an international, non-profit and non-commercial group that is based in Brussels, Belgium. They get their funding from a wide range of industry groups but in a refreshingly nice twist, they make it a point not to endorse any manufacturers or dispensers. In addition to having the most accurate and easy to use hearing screening, you will find an impressive range of useful information about hearing. What’s best, they don’t encourage you to hand over your identity, or urge you to immediately run out and buy something hearing related. in short, they treat you like you are an adult and have a brain. How refreshing.

Hearing test link: http://hear-it.org/page.dsp?forside=yes&area=1185

Web Site link: http://hear-it.org/index.dsp

Second Place: Hear-The-World.com

This site is run by a Swiss manufacturer of hearing aids, called Phonak. You may recognize the name if you watched the Tour de France. Until the recent economic meltdown, they sponsored a race team. Without the sponsorship to pay for, maybe hearing aid prices will drop soon. Don’t hold your breath.

Like Hear-It.org, the test they offer is speech in noise. The test procedure is prettier to look at than Hear-It’s, but is slightly more clumsy to use. Not hard to get through, though. This site, too, has a wealth of information about hearing but it leans more towards corporate-speak in presentation. Apparently Phonak has been invaded by the “You gotta go social!” crowd, as this site is set up to encourage interactive discourse (for lack of a better term) with Phonak, the company. The hearing test doesn’t require a sign up process, but other sections do and that will likely lead to your getting mail from Phonak. As always, your choice. Forewarned is forearmed.

Hearing test link: http://www.hear-the-world.com/en/recognize-hearing-loss/online-hearing-test.html

Web Site link: http://www.hear-the-world.com/

Interesting Alternative: University of New South Wales, School of Physics

If you want to discover your inner geek, this test is right up your alley. It’s a tone test. A BIG tone test. A COMPLICATED tone test. It’s a freaking MONSTER. Got you scared yet? I know that I panned this type of test, but this one from the University of New South Wales School of Physics caught my eye for some reason and is best of breed. Worth doing if you can muck your way through it. I suspect that’s a big if for many people.

What doesn’t it do? It has the same shortcomings all tone tests have – a lousy baseline that makes it of limited value. But here is what it HAS that the others don’t: Loudness Contouring. That’s a fancy way of saying the test goes through discrete frequencies from 30Hz to 16,000Hz! So while you won’t get a good baseline (always important in tone testing) you will be able to see which frequencies you hear better than others. Speech tests don’t touch on this aspect, so there is merit to trying this one. (Don’t worry if you decide to give up part way through, your computer won’t explode and your dog will still love you.)

Quick start hint (for this test only): Turn up your speakers. Way up. Then start clicking the boxes at the bottom of the graph in the 1K column and work your way up until you barely hear the tone. Then do each adjacent column the same way. You should start on the lower side of the scale in each column, because if you have a hearing loss (especially at 1K) you could give yourself an unexpected jolt at other frequencies. The warnings on the page are there for good reason. Once you are done, and if you wish, save a copy of the graph and email it to me (the link is below). We can discuss what the results mean. (P.S. I’ll lose your email address once we are done, unless you ask othewise.)

Hearing test link: http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/hearing.html

As always, feel free to call, write, or email me if you have questions. I love helping people to hear better, and love hearing from you. Yes, you!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.